Thread:Vandraedha/@comment-4011511-20130123190603/@comment-3474542-20130124033111

I'm do not know how putting the navbar at the top of the articles is supposed to fix anything.

I don't know about you, but I see stub articles and incomplete templates on Wikipedia all the time. Wikipedia even has subcategories in their stub category. Perhaps you should view their stub category before you think we have a lot of stub articles.

Most of those other places you are talking about have a lot more editors, and a lot less articles, than we have here. Some places even pay people to write articles. Nobody is getting paid on this wiki.

Many editors do have a favorite topic, or group of topics, and will write a full article every single time that they create a new page. However, that is NOT a requirement when creating new articles.

You're argument seems to be that since we have a lot of articles that need work, we should give up and pretend that the articles are complete. I am not willing to do that.

Yes, pages do need to be filled with text, data and pictures, not templates. However, complaining about it will not make the pages appear out of thin air any faster. If anything, it will slow the production down, because the person is to busy complaining, and others are too busy answering the complaints about why "x" page doesn't exist the way that the first person likes it.

As far as the Diamond Cow article... If you tell me the size, cost, where to get it, benefits, etc. I will add that to the article (or you can add that information yourself). I am not omniscient, and since I do not know the answer to these things, I have not yet added that information.